SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 634

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.B. SAWANT AND B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, JJ.
Chandigarh Administration and another etc. etc., Petitioners
Versus
Manpreet Singh and others etc. etc., Respondents
Spl. Leave Petns. Nos. 16066, 16065 and 16451 of 1991, D/-18-11-1991.

Advocates:
A.A.KHAN, ANIL VERMA, BALRAM GUPTA, J.D.JAIN, J.LAL, KAILASH VASUDEV, KAPIL SIBAL, KAVAL JIT KOCHAR, NANDINI SAHNI, R.K.KAPOOR, RANJIT GHOSAL, YASMINE TARAPORE

Headnote:Constitution of India. Article 226 – extent and exercise of power of the high court college prospectus containing the rule governing admission mentioning five categories reserving 5% of the seats in Engineering College for sons/daughter/spouses of military and para military personnels in the order of priority in the descending order without allocation of seats between the five categories - High court in separate orders holding the categorization to be wrong and unjust and issuing direction for admission of the candidates and even for providing additional seats if no seat available – Orders of the High Court though that categorization was discriminatory and it ought to have struck down the categorization to that exient and directed the rule making authority to reframe the rule – High court should not have indulged in switching the categories and there by assuming the role of rule making authority – it is clearly not the function of the High Court acting under Art. 226 - Art. 226 empowers the high court to issue to any person or authority directions, order or writs – acting under Art. 226 – the High Court does not sit or act as Appellate Authority – its jurisdiction is supervisory in nature for keeping the Govt. and several other authorities and Tribunals within and must ensure that while performing this function it does not over step the well recognized bounds of its own jurisdiction – (1955) 1 SCR 250 ref. (Paras 16, 18. 19, & 20)

ORDER

In the Union Territory of Chandigarh, 5% of the seats are reserved in favour of sons/daughters/spouses of Military / Para-Military personnel Orders in this behalf are issued by the Administration in its memo dated 19th May, 1982 which were later modified in memo dated 6-9-1990. In accordance with the said orders, Punjab Engineering College (a College run by the Chandigarh Administration and affiliated to Punjab University) reserved 15 seats in favour of sons/daughters spouses of Military/ParaMilitary personnel. The College published a prospectus for the session 1991-92. It contains inter alia the rule governing the admission of students to the said college. So far as the reservation in favour of children and spouses of Military/ Para-Military Personnel is concerned, the rule (printed at pages 23 and 24 of the Prospectus) reads as follows:

Sons/ Daughters/ Spouses of Military/ Para Military Personnel etc.:

The Admission of the candidates against the reserved seats under this category will be made on the basis of merit list prepared according to the priorities given below in the descending order:-

1. Sons/Daughters/Spouses of defence personnel who are awardees of gallantry decorations of Paramvir/ Mahavir/ Vir Chakra in person or posthumously.

Or

Sons/daughters/spouses of defence personnel and para-military personnel like CRPF, BSF etc. who are killed or are totally incapacited in action while in service and were wholly dependent on them.

2. Sons/daughters/spouses of defence personnel and paramilitary personnel like CRPF/ BSF etc. who die while in service and were wholly dependent on them;

3. Sons/daughters/spouses of defence personnel and paramilitary personnel like CRPF/BSF incapacitated while in service and were wholly dependent on them;

4. Sons/daughters/spouses of ex-servicemen (military and paramilitary personnel like CRPF/BSF who are wholly dependent on them;

5. Sons/daughters/spouses of serving defence personnel and paramilitary personnel like CRPF/BSF who are wholly dependent on them.

The candidates claiming admissions under the category 1 above are required to submit the photo-copy of citation for the gallantry award, failing which the application will not be considered in this category.

The candidates claiming admission under category 1 are required to submit a certificate from the respective Headquarters regarding death/total incapacitation in action while in service.

The candidates claiming admission under category 2 and 3 are required to submit a certificate from the respective Headquarters regarding death/ total incapacitation while in service.

The candidates claiming admission under category 4 are required to submit discharge certificate from service and certificate of dependence from the district Magistrate of the district concerned.

The candidates claiming admission under category 5 are required to submit the certificate of dependence from the unit in which parent/spouse is serving.

The candidates who apply for admission against this category will also be considered for admission against the seats allocated for Chandigarh/ General Pool to which they may belong as per their merit."

2. A perusal of the rule shows that the five categories are mentioned in the order of priority in the descending order. There is no allocation of seats as between these five categories. It means that in the first instance, all the qualified and eligible candidates falling in category 1 will be given admission and if any seats are left unfilled, qualified candidates falling in category 2 will be admitted. If there are any seats still left unfilled, qualified candidates falling in category 3 will be given admission and so on. In a given year, it may well happen that all the available seats reserved for children/spouses of defence personnel are taken away by the candidates in the first or first and second categories. As a matter of fact, for the year 1990-91, only 6 candidates belonging to sub-category 4 out of 90 candidates could be admitted and

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top