SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 690

M.M.PUNCHHI, G.N.RAY
Jayabharathi Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Sv. P. N. Sn. Rajesekara Nadar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree of a Division Bench of the High Court of Madras passed in L.P.A. No. 97 of 1980.

2. Shorn of all details, it may be stated that the plaintiff-appellants suit was dismissed by the High Court, firstly by a single Bench and affirmedly by a Division Bench on the ground that on the breach of contract between the parties no actual damage had been suffered by the appellant in terms of Section 211 of the Indian Contract Act. The plea of employment of Section 212 of the Contract Act was negatived by the High Court on the ground that neither any factual plea had been taken before the Trial Court to that effect nor had any finding been recorded. The learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant has successfully brought to our notice the additional plea taken in the replication to that effect and an issue struck accordingly. The trial Court had granted a decree in favour of the appellant for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- as damages on breach of contract though it did not specifically earmark those to be whether under S. 211 or 212 of the Indian Contract Act. Those damages had been computed on the basis that on the day when t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top