JUDGMENT

 This appeal by special leave is virtually against the decision of a learned single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which was affirmed by the Letters Patent Bench by a limine order of dismissal.

2. The few facts involved are these:

The appellant is the son of one Ladha Singh. Ladha Singh was a displaced person from West Punjab, now Pakistan. He was allotted agricultural lands in village Lehra gaga, Teh. Sunam, Distt. Sangrur (Punjab State) on quasi-permanent basis. On the scrutiny of his case later when the revenue records came from Pakistan, there was detected a discrepancy. It appears that Ladha Singh had claimed allotment of land far in excess than was due to him. There were two heads of account of land abandoned in Pakistan. One was in the name of Ladha Singh, son of Ganpat Singh and the other in the name of Ladha Singh son of Sant Singh. The appellant claimed that Ladha Singh son of Ganpat Singh and Ladha Singh son of Sant Singh was one and the same person. The Managing Officer differed from that view. Permitting the appellant to retain the allotment due to Ladha Singh son of Ganpat Singh, it was proposed to cancel the allotment representing the land belonging