SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 686

A.M.AHMADI, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Mansukhlal Jadavji Darji – Appellant
Versus
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

VENKATACHALIAH, J.:- Appellants seek special leave to appeal to this Court from the common judgment and order dated 4th April, 1977 of the High Court of Gujarat in F.A. No. 526 of 1975 and 509 of 1975. We have heard Shri P. H. Parekh for the Appellants and Shri T. U. Mehta for the Respondents. Special leave is granted and the appeals are heard and disposed of by this judgment.

2. The two appeals arise out of two of the four suits instituted in the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad where the appellants assailed the validity of the Ahmedabad Town Planning Scheme under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955.The grounds of the challenge were that the mandatory requirements of sub-rules (3) and (4) of R. 21 of the Bombay Town Planning Rules,1955 had not been complied with. Appellants contended that they were tenants in occupation of certain properties belonging to a Public Trust in the City of Ahmedabad; that the reconstitution of the plots under the Scheme respecting the property in their occupation would adversely affect their interests and that, therefore, the Town Planning Officer was required to give special notice to all the "persons-interested" in any plot and to give to all "affec















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top