SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 29

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND M. FATHIMA BEEVI, JJ.
Duli Chand and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents
I.A. No.4 of 1991 in Writ Petn. (Civil) No.1190 of 1989, Dt/-15-1-1992.

Headnote:DIRECTION BY SUPREME COURT TO GOVERNMENT TO GRANT FREEDOM FIGHTER’S PENSION TO EMPLOYEES FROM PARTICULAR DATE BUT GOVERNMENT GRANTING IT FROM LATER DATES WHICH CLEARLY AMOUNTS TO DEFYING DIRECTIONS OF COURT—NOT JUSTIFIED

       - orders given in the case of Duli Chand v. Union of India, AIR 1992 SC 777, that the earlier orders of Court be complied with = 1992(1) JT 193 = 1992(2) SCC 28 = 1992(1) UJSC 466 = 1992(1) SLR 417 = 1992 LIC 583.

ORDER

This application is on behalf of 12 petitioners who have been denied Freedom Fighters pension with effect from August 1, 1980 as directed by this Court. This court by order dated July 16, 1990 disposed of the writ petition in the following terms:

"Mr. Mahabir Singh states that claim of each of these 41 petitioners is supported by relevant documents which he has produced. This assertion is not denied. In view of the same and on account of the statement made on behalf of the Union of India on the earlier occasion to the effect that on documents being produced in support of the claim, there would be no objection to grant of pension and in view of the fact that no counter has been filed challenging the specific claims, we direct that these 41 petitioners shall be paid Freedom Fighters pension at least from 1-8-80, the date from which petitioner No. 20 has been ordered to receive the same. While granting pension from that date the appropriate authority shall ensure that pension at varying rates from time to time is paid to the respective petitioners within three months from today. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly."

2. This Court, thus, categorically directed that the applicants be paid Freedom Fighters pension from August 1, 1980. The respondents have granted pension to the applicants from different dates after August 5, 1986. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents it has been stated that the pension has been given to the applicants from the respective dates when documentary proof in support of their claims was produced by the applicants. No such plea was raised at the time of the hearing of the writ petition. As mentioned in the order reproduced above the Union of India did not file any counter in the writ petition. In the face of clear direction by this Court that the applicants be paid, Freedom Fighters pension with effect from August 1,1980 there is no justification with the respondents to deny the same to the applicants on the ground now raised in the counter filed to the application. The action of the respondents in not granting pension to the applicants with effect from August 1,1980 amounts to defying the directions of this Court. We take serious view of the matter but are not inclined to take any action at this stage. We direct that the orders of this Court dated July 16,1990 be complied with and the applicants be paid Freedom Fighters pension with effect from August 1,1980. This should be done within two months, from today. The application is disposed of.

Order accordingly.

For Citation : AIR 1992 SC 777

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top