SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 456

K.RAMASWAMY, R.M.SAHAI
S. J. Pande – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Balakrishnan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.BHASME, S.B.Bhasme, UMESH BHAGVAT, V.B.JOSHI

JUDGMENT

R. M. SAHAI, J.:—Can a statutory tenant create a licence? If the answer is in affirmative then can such licensee claim immunity from eviction in execution proceedings in view of S. 15A of the Bombay Rent Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 57 of 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act)? These are questions which arise for consideration in this appeal directed against the judgment and order of the Bombay High Court.

2. What happened was that the landlord determined the tenancy of the contractual tenant in October 1966 and filed a suit for his eviction in 1967 which was decreed ex parte on 5th October 1973. In execution of the decree the licensee obstructed and claimed to be protected licensee under S. 15A of the Act. The objection was rejected by the executing and the appellate court. The appellate court found that even though the first licence was created in 1966 before determination of the tenancy for a period of six years but the second licence having been created in 1972, it was not necessary to examine the validity of the first, as second was created when contractual tenant had become statutory tenant therefore he was incapable of transferring any right or intere
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top