R.M.SAHAI, T.K.THOMMEN
Universal Radiators, Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, T. N. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. M. SAHAI, J. :—Legal issues that arise for consideration in this appeal, directed against the decision of the High Court in Commr. of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu v. Universal Radiators, (1979) 120 ITR 906, on questions of law referred to it in a reference under the Income-tax Act (in brief the Act) are, if the excess amount paid to the assessee due to fluctuation in exchange rate was taxable either because the payment being related to trading activity it could not be excluded under Section 10(3) of the Act even if it was casual and non-recurring in nature or it was stock-in-trade, therefore, taxable as revenue receipt or in any case the compensation for the loss of goods could not be deemed anything but profit.
2. Shorn of details the assessee, a manufacturer of radiators for automobiles booked copper ingots from a corporation in the United States of America for being brought to Bombay where it was to be rolled into strips and sheets and then despatched to assessee for being used for manufacture. While the ingots were at sea, hostilities broke out between India and Pakistan and, the vessel carrying the goods was seized by the authorities in Pakistan. The claim of the assessee
relied on : Raghuvanshi Mills Ltd., Bombay v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Ramanathan Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income Tax
S.G. Mercantile Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Calcutta National Bank Ltd.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Canara Bank Ltd.
explained : Raghuvanshi Mills Ltd., Bombay v. Commissioner of Income Tax
distinguished : State Bank of India v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.