SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 514

R.M.SAHAI, A.M.AHMADI
Ratan Chandra Sammanta: Sanat Pakhira – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SUNITA RAO, J.P.BHATTACHARJI, N.R.CHAUDHARY, S.N.MUKHERJEE, SOM NATH MUKHERJI, V.K.VARMA

JUDGMENT

R.M. SAHAI, J.:—Casual labourers of South Eastern Railway, alleged to have been appointed between 1964-69 and retrenched between 1975-78 have approached this Court for a direction to opposite parties to include their names in the live casual labourer register after due screening and give them re-employment according to their seniority. Further prayer is to restrain the opposite parties from filling vacancies from open market.

2. Basis of their claim is two-fold, one -circulars issued by the Railway Board on 8th June and 18th June, 1981 laying guidelines regarding recruitment, retrenchment and employment of the casual labourers; second - Judgments delivered by this Court in 1985 and 1987 directing the opposite parties to prepare a scheme and absorb the casual labourers in accordance with their seniority.

3. Issuing of circulars by the Railway Board or decisions by this Court could not and has not been disputed. Nor it is disputed that in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court the opposite parties framed a scheme in 1987 for employing retrenched casual labourers. On 2-3-1987 a letter was issued from the Railway Establishment addressed to the General Manager for employing
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top