SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 562

G.N.RAY, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Baijnath Mahton – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
GYAN SUDHA MISHRA, R.K.GARG, R.P.SINGH PAL

JUDGMENT

K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.:—There are seven appellants. They along with three others were tried for offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 34 and also under Section 147, I. P.C. The trial Court convicted all of them. On appeal, the High Court acquitted three of them but convicted the seven appellants under Section 304, Part I read with Section 34, I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo three years R.I. The conviction under Section 147, I.P.C. However, was set aside. The High Court held that these appellants exceeded the right of private defence.

2. The accused, two deceased persons in the case and the material witnesses belong to Mahjiladib Village in Hazaribagh District. A piece of land - Plot No. 866 was the subject matter of dispute between appellant No. 1 and the prosecution party. On 29-8-69 P.W. 3 and his men were engaged in agricultural operation in that land. While so the accused persons came and started beating up P.W. 3 and his men Three of the appellants were armed with Tangis and one of them was armed with a spade and the rest were armed with sticks and they attacked the two deceased persons who were working in the field and they also attacked some






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top