SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 836

A.M.AHMADI, N.P.SINGH
Secretary And Commissioner, Home Department – Appellant
Versus
R. Kirubakaran – Respondent


Advocates:
A.MARIAPUTHAM, AMAN VACHHER, ARUNA MATHUR, ARVIND VERMA, P.R.SITHARAMAN, S.K.MEHTA, SONA KHAN

JUDGMENT

N. P. SINGH, J.:—Leave granted.

2. This appeal is on behalf of the Commissioner, Home Department, and the Director General of Police of Tamil Nadu, for setting aside an order dated November 3, 1992 passed by the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") directing the alteration of the date of birth of the respondent in the service records.

3. In the year 1958, the respondent entered in the police service as Sub-Inspector of Police. In due course, he was promoted to the posts of Inspector of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police and Additional Superintendent of Police. According to thedate of birth recorded in his service register, he was to superannuate on 8-8-1992. On 6-8-1991, the said respondent filed an application before the Tribunal for an order to alter his date of birth recorded as 9-8-1934 to 9-8-1936. That application was rejected giving an option to the respondent to approach the Government under the appropriate service rules. A representation to that effect was made, which was rejected on 2-4-1992 and copy of the said order was communicated by the Director General of Police. Thereafter, an application was filed before the Tr














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top