JUDGMENT

SHARMA, J.:—In a writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the land acquisition proceeding an agreement was reached between the appellant and the Improvement Trust for excluding 12 Kanals of land from the Scheme and to pay the appellant the compensation for the remaining land at the .rate of 2 rupees per square yard. The State was a party and joined the compromise through its counsel. The matter was disposed of by the judment at pages 44 to 46. The scheme, however, does not appear to have been formally modified and the appellant had to file an application for contempt, which was again disposed of by the order at page 48. The Improvement Trust, through its counsel gave an undertaking to release the land in presence of State counsel. Still the judgment was not implemented and the appellant had to file a second application for contempt which was dismissed at pages 54 to 6 by leaving the controversy open to be decided in an appropriate proceeding. In these circumstances the present writ petition out of which this appeal arises, was filed by the appellant for implementation of the compromise. The High Court has dismissed the petition on the ground that the State was not