SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 673

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, S.MOHAN, L.M.SHARMA
Secretary To The Government, Harijan And Tribal Welfare Department, Bhubaneswar (Orissa) – Appellant
Versus
Nityananda Pati – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.PANDEY, JANARANJAN DAS

JUDGMENT

SHARMA, J.:—The respondent was appointed as Junior Welfare Extension Officer in the Year 1967. He was compulsorily retired under Rule 71 of the Orissa Service Code by order dated 25-4-1984, which he challenged by filing a writ petition before the High Court. The case was later transferred to the Orissa Administrative Tribunal and was allowed by the impugned judgment. The State of Orissa has challenged the same in the present case.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Special leave is granted.

3. According to the case of the appellants the respondent was born on 4-3-1931. The respondent alleged that the correct date of his birth was 4th March, 1934 and that the assumption made by the appellants was erroneous. He raised several arguments in support of his case. The Tribunal went into the question deeply and rejected the case of the respondent. We have examined the impugned judgment and are satisfied with the conclusion of the Tribunal on this point.

4. So far the order to retire the respondent prematurely is concerned, the Tribunal, while rejecting several arguments of the respondent, agreed with him that the Review Committee, which had considered the case of the respo





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top