SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 156

M.M.PUNCHHI, S.MOHAN, G.N.RAY
Sethani – Appellant
Versus
Bhana – Respondent


JUDGMENT

 This appeal by special leave is against the judgment and order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in S.A. No. 642 of 1973.

2. The plaintiff-appellant is named Sethani. She is pitted against her paternal uncle Bhana. The bone of contention is a piece of agricultural land measuring little over 23 acres in village Cival, Tehsil and, District Burhanpur in the State of Madhya Pradesh.

3. She filed a suit for partition in the Court of Civil Judge, Class I, Burhanpur claiming half share in the aforesaid land representing her father Dalpats share. The plea of the defendant-respondent was that she had nothing to do with the lands which had been settled on him by a family arrangement. The trial Court dismissed the suit but the lower Appellate Court passed a preliminary decree for partition. The defendant respondent filed a Second Appeal before the High Court where an application for amendment of the written statement was made to assert the plea that though at one time the plaintiff had a right in the land in dispute, she had lost it because her mother Putlibai had transferred the same to him for a sum of Rs. 1,000/- by a Registered Sale Deed dated 1-4-1963. On this premi




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top