SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 149

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, R.C.PATNAIK
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

 The appellant, Jagtar Singh was tried along with two others for an offence punishable under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC. The accusation against him was that he caused the death of Balkar Singh and Nirmal Singh by firing at them with a gun. The prosecution examined some eye-witnesses. Doctors evidence also proved that, the two deceased died of gun shot injuries. The accused, Jagtar Singh also had injuries which were caused by a fire arm. He pleaded in his statement under Section 342, Cr.P.C. before the trial Court that two deceased and other persons armed with guns shot at him and he in his self defence had shot at them and that resulted in causing injuries to the deceased persons, who died. The trial court acquitted the other two accused, but convicted the appellant under Section 304, Part I, IPC and sentenced him under each count to ten years imprisonment, but directed the sentences to run consecutively. He was further convicted under Section 27 of the Arms Act to two years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-.

2. The State preferred An. appeal and the High Court held that the offence committed by the appellant was one punishable under Secti





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top