SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 898

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, G.N.RAY
Bank Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Automotive Engineering Company – Respondent


Advocates:
GOPAL BALVANT SATHEY, KAMAKSHI S.MEHLWAI, P.G.GOKHALE, VINOD A.BOBDE

JUDGMENT

G.N. RAY, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Bombay dated March 3, 1981 passed in Second Appeal No. 661 of 1974 affirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional Joint Judge, Thana, in Civil Appeal No. 170 of 1973 dated February 22, 1974, affirming the judgment and decree of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Thana, in Civil Suit No. 363 of 1970 dated April 27, 1973. The plaintiff-Bank of Maharashtra, the appellant herein, instituted the said Civil Suit No. 363 of 1979 for recovering a sum of Rs 7,452, comprising Rs 5,920.12 on account of principal and the balance on account of interest. The relevant facts concerning the instant appeal may be stated as follows.

2. The plaintiff is a nationalised bank carrying on the business of banking under the name of Bank of Maharashtra and it opened a branch at Wagle Industrial Estate, Thana. The defendant-respondent, M/s Automotive Engineering Company, is a partnership firm and the said partnership firm opened a current account with the same branch of the plaintiff-Bank. One firm named M/s Imperial Tube and Hardware Mart opened an account with the Union Bank of India Lt


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top