SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 875

K.RAMASWAMY, KULDIP SINGH
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Appa Balu Ingale – Respondent


Advocates:
K.R.NAGARAJA, M.VIRAPPA

JUDGMENT

KULDIP SINGH, J.:—Appa Balu Ingale and four others were tried for the offences under Ss. 4 and 7 of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 (the Act). The trial Court convicted all of them under S. 4 of the Act and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and a fine of Rs. 100/- each and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for further five days. Appa Balu Ingale was further convicted under S. 7 of the Act but no separate sentence was awarded to him for the said offence. The Additional Sessions Judge, Belgaum, on appeal, upheld the conviction and sentence of Appa Balu Ingale, Shankar Babaji Patil and Rajaram Rama Sankpal. The learned Judge, however, allowed the appeal of the other two convicts and acquitted them. Against the judgment of the Appellate Court Appa Balu Ingale and two others went in revision before the High Court. The learned single Judge of the Karnataka High Court allowed the criminal revision petition and acquitted all of them. This appeal by way of special leave petition is by the State of Karnataka against the judgment of the High Court. During the pendency of the appeal respondent Appa Balu Ingale died on November 4, 1991. The app



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top