SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 589

N.M.KASLIWAL, KULDIP SINGH
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Srikant Chaphekar – Respondent


Advocates:
RAJINDER SINGHVI, S.K.AGNIHOTRI, S.K.Gambhir, S.S.RAY, VIVEK GAMBHIR

JUDGMENT

KULDIP SINGH, J.:—Special leave granted.

2. Srikant Chaphekar, Assistant Director, Town and Country Planning Office, Madhya Pradesh was considered along with other Assistant Directors by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) on March 18, 1981 for promotion for the post of Deputy Director and was not found fit for promotion on the basis of his service record. It is not disputed that a person junior to him was promoted. Chaphekar was, however, promoted to the post of Deputy Director on January 24, 1986. He filed an application before the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in November 1991 seeking promotion to the post of Deputy Director with effect from 1981 when a person junior to him was promoted. The Tribunal by its order dated February 21, 1992 allowed the application directing the State of Madhya Pradesh to promote him to the post of Deputy Director with effect from 1981 and to consider him for further promotion to the post of Joint Director from the date when the person junior to him was promoted. This appeal by way of special leave is by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the order of the Tribunal.

3. It is not disputed that the DPC superseded the respondent o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top