SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 721

KULDIP SINGH, N.M.KASLIWAL
Pashora Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
AMITA GUPTA, R.S.Suri, RAJINDER SACHAR, Sanjay Parikh

JUDGMENT

KASLIWAL, J.:—Special leave granted.

2. Pashora Singh and Lahora Singh, two brothers were tried for offences under Sections 307/ 447/ 326/ 324/ 323 read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code for inflicting injuries on Amar Singh and Pat Singh on 27-8-1981. The learned trial Judge held that charges under Ss. 307 and 326 were not established. The trial Judge found both the accused guilty for the offences under Ss. 447, 324 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. As the accused were not previous convicts, they were granted the benefit of probation under S. 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. The State of Punjab filed an appeal and the complainant filed a revision in the High Court against the aforesaid order of the trial Judge. The High Court found both the accused persons guilty for offence under S. 307 read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code for injuries inflicted on Pal Singh. The High Court also affirmed the conviction of the accused persons under Ss. 447 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court took into consideration the fact that the occurrence had taken place as back as on 27-8-1981 and the accused had undergone the agony of trial for more than a year before the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top