SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 238

A.S.ANAND, N.P.SINGH
Anil Phukan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
P.D.TYAGI, S.K.NANDY, SUNIL JAIN, Vijay Hansaria

JUDGMENT

Dr. ANAND, J.:—Anil Phukan and his brothers Mahendra Phukan and Jojneswar Phukan were tried for an offence under Section 302/34 IPC for the murder of one Trinayan Chandra Baruah on 21-3-1976 at about 8 p.m. The learned sessions Judge convicted all the three brothers for the said offence and sentenced each one of them to suffer imprisonment for life. An appeal was preferred by all the three brothers against their conviction and sentence in the Gauhati High Court. A Division Bench of that court vide judgment dated 6-11-1984 upheld that conviction and sentence of above three. A Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No. 561/ 80 is preferred by Mahendra Nath Phukan and Anil Phukan, the third brother Jojneswar, however, did not file any special leave petition. On 2-9-1985, the special leave petition as regards Mahendra Nath Phukan was dismissed while notice was issued in the petition as regards Anil Phukan. Subsequently, on 29-10-1985, special leave was granted to Anil Phukan and on 29-4-1986, he was also directed to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judl. Magistrate, Golaghat, Assam. We are, therefore, at this stage concerned only with the criminal appeal, by special








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top