SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 362

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Rao Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, A.Subhashini, C.V.SUBBA RAO, M.L.Verma, Niranjana Singh, U.R.Lalit, V.D.KHANNA

JUDGMENT

VENKATACHALA, J.:—This civil appeal by special leave is preferred against the common judgment and separate decree dated 9-5-1980 of the Rajasthan High Court, dismissing Civil First Appeal No. 54 of 1971# in which the appellant, had sought enhanced compensation for his acquired property and partly allowing Civil First Appeal No. 56 of 1971 of the Union of India in which it had sought reduction in the market value of the same acquired property.

(#Reported in 1980 Raj LW 422.)

2. The appellant, since deceased (represented by his Legal Representatives), was the owner in possession of a property known as Masuda House at Ajmer, comprised of a thirty year old building with a large extent of land of about 70 Bighas, 14 Biswas, appurtenant thereto. On 24th April, 1963, the Union of India, in exercise of its powers under S. 29 of the Defence of India Act, 1962 (D.I. Act), requisitioned the said building and land for stationing the Central Reserve Police Force (C.R.P.F.) and took its possession. Then, on 5th May, 1967 the Collector of Ajmer, having served a notice on the appellant under S. 36 of the D.I. Act, acquired the said building and land. As the D.I. Act ceased to have its force




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top