JUDGMENT

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.:—In, a suit for specific performance certain interlocutory orders were passed by a single Judge of the Calcutta High Court. On appeal a Division Bench of the said Court modified the said orders. A number of special leave petitions were filed in this Court against the orders of the Division Bench. Though the petitioners in these special leave petitions are different, the contesting respondents - in all these cases are common, namely Russel Estate Corporation and its managing partner Sri Hari Narayan Bhan.

2. For the purpose. of this petition, it is enough to mention that each of the petitioners in these S.L.Ps. is claiming to be entitled to allotment of one or more of the flats being constructed by the respondents at Calcutta. Their complaint has been that ignoring the agreements in their favour, the respondents have been allotting the constructed flats in favour of third parties thereby seeking to defeat their rights. On 1-8-1991 a Bench of this Court comprising of S. Ranganathan, M. Fathima Beevi and N.D. Ojha, JJ. passed the following order in I.A. No. 2 of 1991 after hearing the respondents.

"Counsel accepts notice. In the meantime, till this Specia