1. Employment dispute — Dismissal of workman — Reinstatement award by Labour Court — Challenge to the award. (Para 1 )
Back
Next 
1993 Supreme(SC) 857
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(BEFORE P.B. SAWANT AND S. MOHAN, JJ.)
H.M.T. LIMITED
Versus
LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM AND OTHERS
Civil Appeal No. 1596 of 1988, decided on September 23, 1993
No party should suffer due to court delays, and the workman should be compensated for the delay in the decision.
Headnote:
Delay in Court Decision - Labour Law - The court modified the award of the Labour Court to give the workman 60 per cent of back wages due to the delay in the decision, emphasizing that no party should suffer due to court delays.
Fact of the Case:
The workman was dismissed on July 30, 1979, and the Labour Court reinstated him. The High Court upheld the reinstatement, but the Supreme Court modified the award due to the delay in the decision.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no error in upholding the reinstatement but modified the award to give the workman 60 per cent of back wages due to the delay in the decision.
Issues: Delay in court decision, reinstatement of workman, back wages
Ratio Decidendi: No party should suffer on account of the delay in the decision by the court. The workman should be given 60 per cent of back wages due to the delay.
Final Decision: The appellant was ordered to reinstate the workman and pay him 60 per cent of all his back wages till the date of his reinstatement, inclusive of increments and pay revisions.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Challenge to the legality of the reinstatement award and the grant of full back wages. (Para 1 )
3. Reinstatement upheld — Long delay in judicial decision — Principle that no party should suffer due to court-induced delay. (Para 1 )
4. Judicial delay — Mitigation of back wages — Balancing equity to ensure no party suffers due to delay in court decision. (Para 1 )
5. Workman reinstated — 60 per cent back wages awarded — Continuity of service benefits granted. (Para 2 )
6. How does judicial delay affect the award of back wages in reinstatement cases?
Where a significant delay occurs in the judicial decision process, the court may reduce the percentage of back wages to ensure that neither party suffers unfairly due to the delay. (Para 1 )
7. Does a reduction in back wages due to delay affect the continuity of service benefits?
No, the court may reduce the percentage of back wages while still granting the workman all other benefits on the footing that they had continued in service. (Para 2 )
8. Do back wages awarded upon reinstatement include pay revisions and increments?
Yes, back wages awarded by the court include increments and revisions in pay. (Para 2 )
ORDER
1. We heard the learned counsel for the parties and also went through the judgments of the courts below and the record. We do not find that any error has been committed by the High Court in upholding the award of the Labour Court reinstating the workman. However, we find that the dismissal of the workman was on July 30, 1979 and till date more than 14 years have elapsed. It is now accepted that no party should suffer on account of the delay in the decision by the court. Taking all facts into consideration, we are of the view that it would meet the ends of justice in the present case, if instead of full back wages, the workman concerned is given 60 per cent of the back wages till he is reinstated.
2. We, therefore, modify the award of the Labour Court as follows. The appellant will reinstate the workman concerned on or before October 15, 1993. They will also pay him 60 per cent of all his back wages till the date of his reinstatement inclusive of the increments and the revisions in pay. The workman will also be entitled to all other benefits on the footing that he had continued in service since July 30, 1979. The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
For Citation : (1994) 2 SCC 38
