SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 64

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(BEFORE P.B. SAWANT AND N.P. SINGH, JJ.)
PARASURAM PATEL AND ANOTHER
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA
Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 1994{Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1444 of 1993}, decided on January 14, 1994

A criminal appeal cannot be dismissed solely due to the default in appearance of the appellants or their counsel; the court must examine the record and decide the case on its merits.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Law - Appeal - Dismissal for default - No criminal appeal can be dismissed on the ground of default in appearance - Court must examine the record of the case and decide the matter on merit, even in the absence of the appellants or their counsel.

Facts of the case:
An appellate court dismissed a criminal appeal solely on the ground that there was a default in the appearance of the appellants and their counsel.

Findings of Court:
The order of dismissal is set aside as the appellate court failed to go into the merit of the matter. The case is remanded for a decision on merit to be disposed of within two months.

Issues: Whether a criminal appeal can be dismissed solely on the ground of default in appearance of the appellants and their counsel.

Ratio Decidendi: It is well settled that no criminal appeal can be dismissed on the ground of default in appearance; the court is obligated to review the record and decide the matter on its merits.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • practice and procedure
    • criminal procedure
      • appeals
        • dismissal for default

ORDER

Special leave granted. In the present case, the High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of the appellants only on the ground that there was default in appearance of the appellants and their counsel. It is now well settled that no criminal appeal can be dismissed on the ground of default in appearance. The Court has to go through the record of the case even in the absence of the appellants or their counsel and decide the matter on merit. Inasmuch as the High Court dismissed the appeal without going into the merit of the matter, the impugned order dated 7-4-1992 is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded to the High Court for decision on merit. In the circumstances of the case, the High Court should dispose of the matter within two months of the receipt of this order. The appeal is allowed accordingly.

For Citation : (1994) 4 SCC 664

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top