SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1020

KULDIP SINGH, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Entertainment Tax Officer – Appellant
Versus
Ambae Picture Palace – Respondent


Advocates:
BHARATI REDDY, C.SITARAMIAH, NIKHIL NAYAR, Premal Nanavati, T.V.S.N.Chari

Judgment

YOGESHWAR DAYAL, J.- This is an appeal on behalf of the Entertainment Tax Officer-I, Khammam and the State of Andhra Pradesh against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dated April 3, 1986 whereby a Division Bench of the High Court struck down Section 1 of Act No. 16 of 1985 [The Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax (Amendment) Act, 1985] to the extent of its applicability retrospectively between September 7, 1984 to October 24, 1984.

2. To appreciate the point it is necessary to deal with the history of the Entertainments Tax Acts in Andhra Pradesh.

3. The Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 (Act No. X of 1939) provided for levy of tax at the fixed rates on the basis of percentage of payment made by a person for admission to any entertainment. However, in 1976 by Act No. 58 of 1976, Section 4-C was introduced under which tax was levied on entertainment show on the basis of certain percentage of the gross collection capacity of the show within the jurisdiction of any local authority whose population does not exceed 25,000. Under Section 5, as introduced by that Act, it was open to a proprietor of the cinema to enter into an agreement with the auth























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top