KULDIP SINGH, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Ameena Amma – Appellant
Versus
Sundaram Pillai – Respondent
Judgment
YOGESHWAR DAYAL, J.- This is an appeal by the plaintiffs by special leave against the judgment of the Single Judge of the High Court of Madras passed in Second Appeal No. 2050 of 1972 dated October 27, 1975 whereby the Single Judge set aside the decree of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil in Appeal Suit No. 33 of 1966 preferred against the decree of the Court of the District Munsif of Nagercoil in Original Suit No. 605 of 1962.
2. According to the plaintiffs, on May 30, 1945 the plaintiffs purchased the suit property i.e. an extent of acres 0-37 cents with a building situated at Nagercoil Town from one Parethuammal under registered sale deed and paid full consideration. One Swaminatha Pillai was in possession of the property, as a lessee under Parethuammal. As the possession was not delivered to the plaintiffs, they filed civil suit being O.S. No. 555 of 1946 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, for the recovery of possession after evicting the lessee Swaminatha Pillai. In this suit the owner Parethuammal and the lessee Swaminatha Pillai were impleaded as defendants 1 and 2. After the suit was filed, the plaintiffs learnt that Swaminatha Pillai, the l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.