SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 469

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Satish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Of Co-operative Societies, Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
SARAT CHANDRA, SATISH CHANDRA AGRAWAL

ORDER

In Writ Petition No. 20 of 1994

1. The petitioners are the practising advocates. They were the members of the Supreme Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd., 110, Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court Compound, New Delhi, for short the Housing Society. By a resolution dated 22-2-1990 passed by the general body of the Housing Society, the petitioners are expelled from the membership of that society, that resolution is approved by the Registrar on 12-8-1991. This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution is, therefore, filed by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs :

(a) to quash the said resolution;

(b) to declare the appointment of Architect as bad, arbitrary and illegal;

(c) to declare the dispensation of residential qualification for membership of society as arbitrary and illegal;

(d) to declare the draw of lots dated 14-4-1990 and 18-7-1992 concerning Phase I and Phase II respectively as arbitrary and illegal;

(e) to appoint an Administrator forthwith and other consequential reliefs.

2. When a question was put to the counsel for the petitioners as to how the writ petition is maintainable, it was contended that the expulsion was per se arbitrary and they are entitled to c






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top