SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 605

A.S.ANAND, KULDIP SINGH
U. P. Bhumi Sudhar Nigam LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Narain Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
GOPAL SUBRAMANIUM, R.K.MAHESHWARI, SUNIL JAIN, VINIT MAHESHVARI

Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, JJ.

( 1 ). SPECIAL leave granted.

( 2 ). Uttar Pradesh Bhumi Sudhar Nigam Limited (the Corporation) advertised for the post of Financial Controller in the year 1990. As a result of the interviews held by the selection committee, a panel of three names was recommended to the Corporation. One S. K. Sachdeva was at number one and Shiv Narain Gupta, respondent in the appeal herein, was at number two in thesaid panel. An appointment letter was issued to S. K. Sachdeva and he was asked to join the post by 31/10/1990. S. K. Sachdeva having failed to join the post, Shiv Narain Gupta represented before the Corporation that he, being next on the merit panel, be considered for appointment to the post. When no action was taken by the Corporation for considerable time, Shiv Narain Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High court. The writ petition was allowed by a learned Single Judge of the High court and a mandamus was issued to the Corporation to appoint Shiv Narain Gupta to the post of Financial Controller. This appeal by the Corporation is against the judgment of the High court.

( 3 ). Mr Go






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top