SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 835

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, G.N.RAY
Jamna – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.PUNDIR, BINU TARNTA, R.K.GARG, RANJIT GHOSAL

Judgment

K. JAVACHANDRA REDDY, J. - This is an appeal under S. 379, Cr.P.C. read with S. 2 of the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act. There are eight appellants. They along with eight others were tried for offences punishable under Ss. 147, 148, 302/149, 324/149 and 323/149, I.P.C. The trial Court acquitted all of them. The State preferred an appeal and the High Court while confirming the acquittal of the other accused, convicted the appellants. Appellants Nos. 1 to 4 are convicted under Ss. 302 read with 34, I.P.C. and each of them is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. The remaining four appellants are convicted under Ss. 326/ 149. I.P.C. and each of them is sentenced to undergo two years R.I. Ghanshyam, appellant No. 4 and Shyam Lal, appellant No. 5 are further convicted under S. 147, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo six months R. I. and the remaining six appellants are convicted under S. 148, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo one years R.I. All the eight appellants are further convicted under Ss. 324/149 and 323/ 149, I.P.C. and each of them is sentenced to undergo one year and six months R.I. respectively. Appellant No. 1 Jamna is reported to be dead a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top