Judgment

JUDGMENT :-Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Both these appeals arise out of the same judgment of the High Court. The two appellants in these appeals Gurcharan Singh and Surjit Singh were tried for offences punishable under Section 302/34, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. They preferred two separate appeals to the High Court and the same were dismissed by the High Court. Hence, these two appeals before us.

3. The prosecution case is as follows :-

Both the appellants and the deceased Narinder Pal and some of the material witnesses belong to Amritsar. The two accused were indulging in gambling. About two months prior to the present occurrence, there was a dispute between the appellant Gurcharan Singh and the deceased Narinder Pal. On 17-5-1979 at about 8.45 p.m. the deceased was at the shop of his father Des Raj (PW 3) and at that time, PW-4 was also present at the shop. The accused took the deceased with them on the pretext of seeing a movie. On that night at about 1.00 a.m. both the accused had a quarrel with him at chowk Guru Ram Dass Sarai. It is alleged that Gurcharan Singh caught hold of the deceased by his neck while the other accu