SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1017

S.MOHAN, S.R.PANDIAN
Surjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Garja Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
J.S.VASU, P.CHAUDHARY, S.U.SINGH, SATISHVIG, SURYA KANT SHARMA, T.S.ARORA

Judgment

MOHAN, J.:- The facts leading to this Civil Appeal are as under :

The suit property in question was originally owned by one Gulaba Singh. He died on September 5, 1969. The plaintiffs laid a suit No. 217/137 in the Court of Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Dhuri on 18-6-1970 for possession of the suit property on the plea that they were the grandsons of the fathers brother of the said Gulaba Singh. They also based their claim on the will stated to have been executed by Gulaba Singh in their favour on August 16, 1969. It was further averred in the plaint that the first defendant has no right, title or interest in the suit property. Her claim that she was validly married to Gulaba is baseless. The Karewa Nama dated October 28, 1965 alleged to have been executed between Gulaba Singh and the first defendant was a nominal transaction. In fact, the Karewa Nama recited that the first defendant was married to Bishan Singh who died about four years ago on April 22, 1964. The mutation of inheritance of the deceased was sanctioned in favour of the first defendant Surjit Kaur. Therefore, it had become necessary for the plaintiffs to file a suit for possession of the land and the house in question:


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top