P.B.SAWANT, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Bakshish Singh: Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Darshan Engineering Works – Respondent
Judgment
SAWANT, J. :- These two appeals - one by the Union of India and the other by the aggrieved employee - are directed against the decision dated 24th March, 1983 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court whereby the High Court has struck down Section 4(l)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 [hereinafter referred to as the Act] as being violative of Article 19(l)(g) of the Constitution of India.
2. The admitted factual matrix of the case is in a narrow compass. Bakshish Singh, the appellant-employee joined the services of the respondent-M/s. Darshan Engineering Works as a Fitter on 2nd March, 1968 and resigned from service on 10th December, 1978 after a total period of continuous service of more than 10 years. His last drawn wages were Rs. 335/- per month. It is not disputed that at the time he joined the employment on 2nd March, 1968, his age was 54 years 3 months, his date of birth being 17th December, 1913. This was known to the respondent-employer.
3. The Act came into force w.e.f. 21st September, 1972. On the employees resignation w.e.f. 10th December, 1978 which was accepted by the respondent-employer, he claimed gratuity under Section 4(1)(b) of the Act. His claim not having
relied on : U. Unichoyi v. State of Kerala
Bijay Coiton Mills Lid. v. State of Ajmer
Crown Aluminium Works v. Workmen
Garment Cleaning Works v. Workmen
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Workmen
Bharatkhand Textile Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Textile Labour Assn.
relied on : Straw Board Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Workmen
distinguished : British Paints (India) Ltd. v. Workmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.