SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 82

M.FATHIMA BEEVI, S.R.PANDIAN
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Garbad Patil – Respondent


JUDGMENT - The State of Maharashtra on being aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court of Maharashtra at Bombay dated 27th April, 1979 rendered in Cr1. A. No. 703 of 1978 whereby the High Court has set aside the conviction of the respondent under S.302, I.P.C. and the sentence of imprisonment for life imposed therefor by the trial Court, has preferred this appeal.

2. The respondent who is the sole accused in this case took his trial before the Addl. Sessions Judge, Jalgaon on the allegation that he at about 6 or 6.30 p.m. on 25th April; 1975 in Deshmukh Wadi at Pachora committed the murder of Varajlal Narayan Parmar (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) by stabbing him with a knife.

3. As the facts of this case are well set out in the judgment of the trial Court as well as the High. Court, we feel that it is not necessary to reiterate the same except mentioning certain salient features. It appears there was a deep rooted enmity between the accused and the deceased since 1974 over an incident relating to the kidnapping of the sister of the deceased by name Veena by the respondent-accused. In respect of that incident, there was a case against the respondent for an offence under


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top