SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1024

KULDIP SINGH, S.C.AGRAWAL
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
S. Dharmalingam – Respondent


Advocates:
ANIL KATIYAR, C.V.SUBBA RAO, K.K.VENUGOPAL, Niranjana Singh, PRAMOD DAYAL, V.C.MAHAJAN

Judgment

S. C. AGRAWAL, J. - This appeal, by special leave, raises the question whether the benefit of addition to his qualifying service under Rule 30 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) can be availed by a person who was already employed as a Government servant when he was appointed to the service or post referred to in Rule 30.

2. The respondent was employed as Investigator in the National Sample Survey with effect from May 8, 1956. While thus employed he was selected for the post of Labour Officer, by way of direct recruitment through the Union Public Service Commission, and having been appointed on the post of Labour Officer; he joined the said post on May 16, 1960. The respondent has retired from service in August, 1985. The period of service from May, 8, 1956 till May 16, 1960, when he was working as Investigator in the National Sample Survey was included in his qualifying service. He, however, claimed further benefit of addition in qualifying service under Rule 30 of the Rules which claim of the respondent was not accepted by the authorities and thereupon he moved the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short the Tribuna






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top