SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 608

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, N.P.SINGH
Gtjrucharan Koeri – Appellant
Versus
Bibi Shamsunissa – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SHARAN, S.B.SANYAL, Uday Sinha, VISHNU MATHUR

Judgment

N.P. SINGH, J. - Leave granted.

2. The plaintiffs are the appellants before this Court. They filed a suit for redemption, of mortgage bond dated 28th July, 1916 executed by Gopal Mahto. the ancestor of the appellants in favour of one Akram Hussain. The suit had to be instituted when the defendant refused to accept the mortgage money. which was tendered to her. The trial Court dismissed the said suit. On appeal being filed by the appellants, the suit was decreed by the learned Subordinate Judge and the respondent was directed to withdraw the money deposited in her favour and to deliver vacant possession of the land to the appellants within the time fixed by the Court, failing which the appellants were to take possession of the disputed land through the process of the Court. On second appeal being filed on behalf of the defendant/ respondent, the High Court dismissed the suit on the ground that as the suit for redemption had been filed only in respect of one of the five plots, which had been mortgaged in favour of the predecessor in interest of the defendant, the said suit was not maintainable.

3. Before the High Court. a stand was taken on behalf of the respondent that by the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top