SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1000

KULDIP SINGH, S.C.AGRAWAL
Central Board Of Secondary Education – Appellant
Versus
Vineeta Mahajan – Respondent


Advocates:
G.RAMASVAMY, NILAM SHARMA, P.P.Rao, RAJIV SHARMA, RAJNI K.PRASAD, S.K.MEHTA, T.C.SHARMA

Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, J.- Special leave granted.

2. Vineeta Mahajan, respondent in this appeal, appeared in Class XII examination conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education, Delhi, in the month of March, 1993. She sat for the Political Science paper on March 16, 1993 in the said examination. During the course of examination, the invigilator found the respondent in possession of written-material in the shape of three small pieces of paper kept in the pencil box. The matter was reported to the Central Superintendent. Proceedings in respect of the charge "for using unfair means at the examination" were initiated by the Result Committee of the Board. The respondent was examined by the said Committee on July 19, 1993. She admitted having kept the said papers in the pencil box but she stated that she had not used the same while answering the question paper. According to her she arrived at the examination hall late due to car puncture on the way and, as such, was utterly confused and panicky and in that mental state she forgot to take-out the papers from the pencil-box before entering the examination hall. The Deputy Superintendent of the Examination Centre stated before the Com











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top