SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 267

G.N.RAY, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Sukhwinder Singh Alias Jaggi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

JUDGMENT - This is an appeal under S. 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) filed against the judgment of the Designated Court, Amritsar. The appellant Sukhwinder Singh has tried along with one Harnek Singh for offences punishable under Ss. 397 read with S.511, IPC, 307 read with S.34, IPC and under S. 3 read with S. 34 of TA DA. Both of them were convicted and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. Sukhwinder Singh alone has filed this appeal. The prosecution case is as follows :

2. On 6-10-88 when PW-3, Rachhpal singh and his father PW-4, Sohan Singh were present in their farm house situated in the area of Village Udhonangal, three young-men came on motor cycle and after parking the same one out of them remained at the motor cycle. The two accused entered the farm house. The accused Sukhwinder Singh. appellant herein, was armed with a revolver. He took out the same and demanded Rupees 50,000/- from Sohan Singh and Rachhpal Singh at the point of pistol failing which both the accused threatened them that they would be killed. Both Sohan Singh and Rachhpal Singh told them that they had no ready cash. Thereupon, the appellant fired a






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top