SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 866

YOGESHWAR DAYAL, S.C.AGRAWAL, A.S.ANAND, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, J.S.VERMA
C. B. Gautam – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

ORDER :- Union of India has moved this application for certain clarifications and directions with a view to. obviating certain difficulties that it envisages in applying the principles laid down in the main judgment dated 17-1 l-l992* by the Constitution Bench to cases other than the case of the particular petitioner in that case. We have heard learned Solicitor General in support of this application.

*Reported in 1992 (6) JT (SC) 678

2. Our attention was drawn to two aspects : one in relation to the large number of similar petitions yet pending before this Court and the various High Courts where, in view of the subsisting orders of stay operating therein, it would not be possible immediately to take steps and implement the directions contained in the judgment within the time-frame stipulated therein. The second aspect relates to pending matters before the authorities, which, though not pending before courts, do not also admit of application of the principles consistent with the statutory limit. After hearing the learned Solicitor General, we are satisfied that the problems and difficulties envisaged, in practical terms, are real and require to be provided for.

3. The first as









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top