YOGESHWAR DAYAL, S.C.AGRAWAL, A.S.ANAND, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, J.S.VERMA
C. B. Gautam – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
ORDER :- Union of India has moved this application for certain clarifications and directions with a view to. obviating certain difficulties that it envisages in applying the principles laid down in the main judgment dated 17-1 l-l992* by the Constitution Bench to cases other than the case of the particular petitioner in that case. We have heard learned Solicitor General in support of this application.
*Reported in 1992 (6) JT (SC) 678
2. Our attention was drawn to two aspects : one in relation to the large number of similar petitions yet pending before this Court and the various High Courts where, in view of the subsisting orders of stay operating therein, it would not be possible immediately to take steps and implement the directions contained in the judgment within the time-frame stipulated therein. The second aspect relates to pending matters before the authorities, which, though not pending before courts, do not also admit of application of the principles consistent with the statutory limit. After hearing the learned Solicitor General, we are satisfied that the problems and difficulties envisaged, in practical terms, are real and require to be provided for.
3. The first as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.