1992 Supreme(SC) 682
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY AND G. N. RAY, JJ.
Ramesh Kumar, Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 105 of 1982, D/- 23-9-1992.
Headnote:
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 313 – Offence of murder - Charge-sheet – Appeal against conviction - Deceased was married to appellant few months prior to occurrence - Unfortunately, relations between deceased and appellant became unhappy - About 10 days prior to occurrence, deceased went to her parents house and stayed there for about 7 days - Thereafter appellant brought her back to his house in absence of his father-in-law (PW 3), who was away from his house - After his return, PW 3 and his wife went to see deceased in the house of accused to enquire about their welfare - It is alleged that they found appellant and his mother and deceased quarrelling with one another - It is also alleged that appellant and his mother told them that they would kill the deceased in order to end daily quarrel - PW-3 and his wife intervened and pacified them and on their intervention, appellant and his mother assured that they would avoid quarrelling in future - On same day, at about 3.30 p.m. deceased who was found to be unconscious was taken to hospital by mother of appellant - Doctor (PW-l) informed police and deceased was found already dead by then - PW-3, father-in-law of the accused was also informed about death of deceased - He found that stomach was full of semi-digested food - Held, presence of mother of accused who was also prosecuted has created a doubt, as to whether it was mother or son who administered poison to the deceased - No doubt, even in such a case the appellant would also be responsible, but unless prosecution clearly establishes that death was not due to suicide and it was only homicidal by administration of Potassium Cyanide, he cannot alone be held liable - From circumstances which have been relied upon by prosecution and courts below, it would show that entire reasoning proceeds on footing that accused could have come into possession of Potassium Cyanide, therefore, inference is that accused must have administered same - That was a case where facts and circumstances of case ruled out possibility of suicide as there was external injuries - Then, having regard to other circumstances, Court reached conclusion that accused therein had a motive to administer poison and particularly when death was proved to be homicidal - When the case of a murder is made out, circumstances would be different to establish his guilt - Facts therein are distinguishable - Though a strong suspicion is there against appellant, but same cannot take place of proof - Therefore, Court set aside conviction and sentence awarded by Courts below - Appeal is allowed accordingly.
Judgment
JUDGMENT:- Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The sole appellant has been convicted u/S. 302. I.P.C. for the murder of his wife Smt. Kamlesh by administering Potassium Cyanide on 3-6-77 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default, of payment to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for one year. The appellants mother Smt. Soma Wanti was also tried along with the appellant for the same offence. But she was acquitted. The appellant preferred an appeal. But the High Court dismissing the same confirmed the conviction and sentence awarded by the trial Court. However, the State did not challenge the acquittal of his mother, Smt. Soma Wanti.
3. The facts lie in a very narrow compass. The deceased was married to the appellant few months prior to the occurrence. Unfortunately, the relations between the deceased and the appellant became unhappy. About 10 days prior to the occurrence, the deceased went to her parents house and stayed there for about 7 days. Thereafter the appellant brought her back to his house in the absence of his father-in-law (PW 3), who was away from his house. After his return, PW 3 and his wife went to see the deceased in the house of the accused to enquire about their welfare. It is alleged that they found the appellant and his mother and the deceased quarrelling with one another. It is also alleged that the appellant and his mother told them that they would kill the deceased in order to end the daily quarrel. PW-3 and his wife intervened and pacified them and on their intervention, the appellant and his mother assured that they would avoid quarrelling in future. On 3-6-77, the same day, at about 3.30 p.m. the deceased who was found to be unconscious was taken to the hospital by the mother of the appellant. The doctor (PW-l) informed the police and the deceased was found already dead by then. PW-3, the father-in-law of the accused was also informed about the death of the deceased. Since it was suspected that the death was due to poisoning a case was registered. The inquest was held and the dead body was sent for post-mortem. Dr. S. G. Garg, who examined the dead body on 4-6-77, did not find any external marks of injury. He found that the stomach was full of semi-digested food. He conducted the post-mortem and examined the viscera and the same was sent to Chemical Examiner. The Chemical Examiner found poison in the stomach of the deceased. It was held that the death was caused due to Cyanide poisoning. On 4-6-77, Gurbachan Singh (PW-4) along with Kewal Krishan P.W. went to the Civil Hospital, Ludhiana as the accused was admitted in the hospital. It is stated that the appellant was feeling giddy after having consumed some tablets. He was treated for the same. The further prosecution case is that the appellant/accused told the PW-4 that he had brought Potassium Cyanide from the factory in which he was working and administered it to Kamlesh, the deceased. This was treated as an extra judicial confession in this case. On 4-6-77, S.I. Swarup Singh (PW-9) went to R. K. Machine Tools Factory. Ludhiana where the appellant was working. He examined the Chief Engineer (PW-5) of the factory and also took into possession of 2.850 miligram of Potassium Cyanide as a sample. The sample was also sent to the Chemical Examiner who examined and found that it contained Potassium Cyanide. After completion of the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed. When examined under Section 313, Cr. P. C., the appellant / accused denied the charge against him. He, however, admitted the stay of his wife with her parents for about seven days. He also stated that on 3-6-77, at about 9-9.30 a.m. he was asked by Kamlesh, the deceased, to bring some tea leaves from the market, and after his returning he found Kamlesh lying unconscious and came to know that the deceased died afterwards. He also said that he and his mother were falsely implicated in this case. The learned trial Judge, beli