SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY AND G. N. RAY, JJ.
Lakhbir Singh and another, Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal Nos. 510-512 of 1983, D/- 26-11-1993.
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 302 and 307, 34 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Arms Act - Section 25 – Offence of murder - Charged – Appeal against conviction - Deceased and material witnesses including three eye-witnesses P.Ws. 4. 5 and 6 belong to village - P. W. 4 is son of deceased - There was enmity between the deceased and his family members and accused - On Diwali previous to present occurrence one brother of second appellant was murdered - First appellant lodged a report against deceased for said murder - Police during enquiry found to be innocent and instead, appellant No. 1 and his brother and some others and case was still pending - A-1 came there from side and entered jeep from behind along with other accused - Acquitted accused is alleged to have raised a lalkara - Hearing same P.Ws. 4, 5 and 6 looked towards the jeep and found A-1 taking out a 12 bore country made pistol and firing at back of deceased - A-3 was also armed with a 12 bore country made pistol - He fired a shot simultaneously which hit deceased on head on right side - All witnesses ran towards jeep and raised cries and it is alleged that acquitted accused fired a shot with his 12 bore country made pistol but same did not hit anybody - When witnesses saw accused reloading pistols they ran away and accused left place – Held, P.Ws. 4, 5 and 6 have been cross-examined at length - Except eliciting some omissions in respect of minor details they have not been shaken - So far as medical evidence and expert evidence in respect of nature of weapons used and distance from which shots were fired, are concerned, Court do not come across any serious infirmity in prosecution case - Doctor, P.W. 1 who conducted post-mortem, has stated that injuries found on deceased must have been caused by firearms - As a matter of fact some pellets also were removed from body - Therefore there cannot be any doubt that fire-arms were used - In view of this positive evidence even if some of recovered weapons as per ballistic experts evidence could not have been used, that by itself is not a serious infirmity - Eye-witnesses have categorically stated that country-made pistols were used and medical evidence shows that death was due to injuries caused by fire-arms - This aspect has been considered by Sessions Court in detail and it has been rightly observed that shots have been fired from country made pistols - There was every possibility of holes caused being slightly bigger than muzzle – Court have carefully gone through evidence of eye-witnesses and reasons given by two courts for believing their evidence - Court see absolutely no grounds to come to a different conclusion - Accordingly, appeals are dismissed.
Judgment
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J. :- These three appeals are filed by the original accused Nos. 1 and 3 against the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court. The two appellants along with Bawa Singh and Bir Singh. original accused Nos. 2 and 4 respectively were tried for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 30734, I.P.C. for causing the death of one Gulab Singh and for attempting to commit the murder of the witnesses. The trial Court convicted the two appellants under Section 302/34, I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default of payment of which to undergo six months R.I. The two appellants were also separately convicted under S.25 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo one years R.I. Questioning those convictions the accused preferred three appeals to the High Court and all the three appeals were dismissed. Hence the present appeals.
2. The prosecution case is as follows:-
The deceased Gulab Singh and the material witnesses including the three eye-witnesses P.Ws. 4. 5 and 6 belong to village Mehma Sarja. P. W. 4 is the son of the deceased. There was enmity between the deceased and his family members and the accused. On Diwali previous to the present occurrence one Beant Singh brother of Gurdev Singh. the second appellant was murdered. Lakhbir Singh, the first appellant lodged a report against the deceased for the said murder. The police during the enquiry found Gulab Singh to be innocent and instead of Gulab Singh, appellant No. 1 and his brother and some others were challaned and the case was still pending. On 12-9-81 Gulab Singh, the deceased had gone for purchasing medicines from Goniana Mandi as he was not feeling well. P.W. 4, son of deceased also came to Goniana Mandi for purchasing insecticides and also to procure money from the Commission Agent. At about 6 P.M. the deceased was standing near the railway crossing for going to his Village. P.W. 4 met the deceased when he was talking to Jarnail Singh, P.W. 5 and Gulzara Singh, P.W. 6 who belonged to their Village. P.Ws. 4, 5 and 6 went near the hand pump for drinking water which was at a distance of about 10 karmas from the pitter jeep in which the deceased was sitting on the front seat. Lakhbir Singh, A-1 came there from the side of Gurduwara and entered the jeep from behind along with other accused. Bir Singh, the acquitted accused is alleged to have raised a lalkara. Hearing the same P.Ws. 4, 5 and 6 looked towards the jeep and found A-1 taking out a 12 bore country made pistol and firing at the back of the deceased. Gurdev Singh, A-3 was also armed with a 12 bore country made pistol. He fired a shot simultaneously which hit the deceased on the head on the right side. All the witnesses ran towards the jeep and raised cries and it is alleged that the acquitted accused Bawa Singh fired a shot with his 12 bore country made pistol but the same did not hit anybody. When the witnesses saw the accused reloading the pistols they ran away and the accused left the place. P.Ws. 4, 5 and 6 went near the deceased and found him dead on the front seat of the jeep. Leaving P.W. 5 at the place of occurrence, P. Ws. 4 and 6 went to the Police Station which was nearby and lodged a report which was recorded by S.I. Gurnam Singh. A case was registered and the Sub-Inspector reached the place of occurrence and got the photographs of the scene of occurrence taken. He also recovered three empty cartridges from the scene of occurrence. After holding the inquest he sent the dead body for post-mortem. The Doctor, P.W. 1, who conducted the post-mortem, found four gun-shot injuries and on internal examination he found that the right lung was injured and he opined that injuries Nos. 1 and 2 were individually sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature and that the injuries were caused by fire-arms.
3. Immediately after the occurrence, the police went after the accused. They saw three persons running. Gurdev Si
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.