SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1051

YOGESHWAR DAYAL, P.B.SAWANT
Wellman India Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

SAWANT, J. :- Special leave granted.

The appellant-company filed an application before the Employees Insurance Court under Section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the Employees State Insurance Corporation (the Corporation) for a declaration that the demand of the Corporation of the employees contribution and the employers contribution on the payment made under the companys quarterly attendance bonus Scheme (the Bonus Scheme) was not valid. The Insurance Court allowed the said application and against that decision the Corporation preferred an appeal to the High Court. The learned single Judge reversed the decision of the Insurance Court holding that the attendance bonus was payable under the terms of the contract and, therefore, was "wages" within the meaning of Section 2(22) of the Act. In the Letters Patent Appeal preferred by the appellant, the Division Bench of the High Court confirmed the said decision. Hence the present appeal.

2. To appreciate the controversy between the parties, it is necessary to understand the salient features of the Bonus Scheme. The Bonus Scheme was a part of a settlement entered into betwe





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top