SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1181

A.S.ANAND, R.M.SAHAI
P. Munian – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.MARIAPUTHAM, A.T.M.SAMPATH, ARUNA MATHUR, K.RAM KUMAR

Judgment

R. M. SAHAI, J. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is if the land in dispute is, minor Inam as defined in sub-section (9) of Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition & Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1963 (Act 30 of 1963) (hereinafter referred to as Act 30 of 1963) or it is, new-main estate under Act 26 of 1963.

2. Proceedings commenced on an application filed under Section 5 of Act 30 of 1963 by the Devasthanam landholder-respondent for declaration that the land in dispute of Title Deed No. 837 situated in Village Annapettai was minor inams as defined in Act 30 of 1963. The claim was contested both by the tenants appellants and the State Government. The application was allowed by the Settlement Officer. It was found that even though the original grant had not been made available by the respondents nor extracts from Inam Fair Register were filed, yet there was material available on the record for arriving at a decision about the nature of the land. It was held that the original grant for Title Deeds Nos. 836, 838 and 839 were available. Since these grants established that the land carved out of the village had been given to these institut














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top