SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 724

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY AND G. N. RAY, JJ.
Anumula Papodu alias Thimmaiah and others, Appellants
Versus
Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andh. Pra., Hyderabad, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal Nos. 81 and 82 of 1980, D/- 27-8-1993.

Advocates:
A.V.Velayudhan Nair, G.PRABHAKAR RAO

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 148, 302/149, 324, 326, 324/149 and 326/ 149 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 379 - SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act - Section 2 – Offence of murder - Voluntarily causing hurt – Rioting ,armed with deadly weapons – Unlawful assembly - Charged - Long-standing faction between family , deceased No. l(D-l) and that of one, an Advocate - Both families are natives of Village of District - Deceased No. 2 (D-2), P.Ws 1,4,5,7,8 and 9 and others are followers of D-l - A-1, A-2 and A-S are brothers -A 3 and A-4 are his nephews - Other accused were also his followers - Factions were in existence since 20 years and there were seyeral riotings and murders between two factions resulting in criminal case - Ws 1, 5,7,9 and some others of D- ls party were witnesses for prosecution in that case - Due to bitterness of feelings between parties and tense atmosphere, bandobust constables were posted village to maintain law and order - D-l, P.Ws I and 8 had to attend Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - They left their houses in morning for bus-stop to go along with some of their partymen including P.Ws 4, 5, 7 and 9. P,Ws 3 and 6 also came to bus-stop - They missed two or three buses - Later they got into a bus along with D-l and D-2 - They alighted at bus stop and were proceeding to town along road -P.W. 2 who was near Brokers office, also joined them and they were all proceeding talking to each other – Held, courts below have believed evidence of P.Ws 1 to 9, we have, however, examined their evidence - Medical evidence also establishes that cutting weapons were used in inflicting injuries on the two deceased persons as well as on injured witnesses - Trial judge failed to notice that all nine accused along with some others emerged in a body and all of them participated in occurrence – Court are unable to see as to how trial Judge could come to conclusion that common object of unlawful assembly was not to commit murder - Assuming witnesses have not narrated details on attack on two deceased persons, that by itself is not a ground to hold that common object of unlawful assembly was not to commit murder - On D-l there were as many as 16 incised wounds all over body and on D-2 there were as many as 10 incised wounds - As a matter of fact P.Ws 1,4,7,8 and 9 have given some details of attack on D-1 and D-2 - In any event it is impossible to hold under circumstances that common object of unlawful assembly was not to commit murder - When once evidence of P.Ws 1 to 9, injured witnesses is believed by courts below, only conclusion that can be reached is that all assailants were members of a unlawful assembly and their common object was to commit murder of D-l and D-2 and to cause injuries to P.Ws 1 to 9 - There are absolutely no merits in these appeals - Accordingly both the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment

K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J. :- There are nine appellants. They along with three others were tried for offences punishable under Sections 148, 302/149, 324, 326, 324/149 and 326/ 149, I.P.C. The trial Court acquitted A-11 and A-12 and convicted the appellants u/ Ss. 148,324 and 324/149, I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo R. I. for 18 months under Section 148 and 2.1 months on each of the other two counts. They were, however, acquitted of the murder charge. A-10 died during the trial. The State preferred Criminal Appeal No. 393/78 against all the 11 accused questioning their acquittal of the murder charge. The nine convicted accused preferred Criminal Appeal No. 1310/ 78. The High Court disposed of both the appeals by a common judgment and dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 1310/ 78 filed by the accused but allowed Criminal Appeal No. 393/78 filed by the State against A-1 to A-9 and convicted all the nine accused under Sections 302/149 and 326/149 and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life and R.I. for three years respectively. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. Hence the present appeals.

2. Since these are regular appeals filed under Section 379, Cr. P. C. read with Section 2 of the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, we have gone through the judgments of both the courts below and also the depositions of the material witnesses.

3. The prosecution case is as follows:

There was long-standing faction between the family of Gunnala Ramachandra Reddy, deceased No. l(D-l) and that of one Narasimhulu, an Advocate. Both the families are natives of Nallagatla Village of Allagadda Taluk of Kurnool District. Issac, deceased No. 2 (D-2), P.Ws 1,4,5,7,8 and 9 and others are the followers of D-l. A-1, A-2 and A-S are the brothers of Narasimhulu. A 3 and A-4 are his nephews. The other accused were also his followers. The factions were in existence since 20 years and there were seyeral riotings and murders between the two factions resulting in criminal cases. In February 1976, a case involving seven deaths was pending trial against the partymen of the Advocate Narasimhulu. P.Ws 1, 5,7,9 and some others of D- ls party were witnesses for the prosecution in that case. Due to the bitterness of feelings between the parties and the tense atmosphere, bandobust constables were posted the village to maintain law and order. D-l, P.Ws I and 8 had to attend the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Allagadda on 23-2-1976. They left their houses in the morning for the bus-stop to go to Allagadda along with some of their partymen including P.Ws 4, 5, 7 and 9. P,Ws 3 and 6 also came to the bus-stop. They missed two or three buses. Later they got into a bus along with D-l and D-2. They alighted at the bus stop Allagadda and were proceeding to the town along the road. P.W. 2 who was near the Brokers office, also joined them and they were all proceeding talking to each other. It was then about 11.30 A. M. or so. When they reached the house of Advocate Narasimhulu, A-l armed with a hunting sickle and A-4 armed with a spear suddenly came out of the house and A-4 stabbed D-l on the left side of the ribs with the spear. A-l cut D-l on his right wrist with the hunting sickle. A-2, A-3 and A-S to A-12 also joined A-l and A-4. A-2, A-6 and A-8 were armed with hunting sickies. A-5 was armed with a battle-axe. A-3, A-7 and A-9 to A-12 were armed with spears. P.Ws 4, 5,7 and 8 intervened and pushed D-l towards the pial of Lakshmi Narasimhulu. A-l to A-5 went up to the pial and attacked D-1 with the weapons in their hands. When D-2 tried to intervene, A-6 to A-10 attacked him with the weapons in their hands. The other P.Ws tried to intervene. In the process P.W. 1 received an incised injury on his wrist. P.W. 2 was also stabbed with spear by A-3. P.W. 3 was cut on the right side of his forehead with a battle-axe by A-5. P.W. 4 was cut with hunting sickles by A-1 and A-6 on several parts of his body. P.W. S









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top