SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 884

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P. B. SAWANT AND N. VENKATACHALA, JJ.
Vijay Mills Company Limited etc. etc., Appellants
Versus
State of Gujarat and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 82 of 1985 With 83-119, 119A of 1985, 3785, 3742 of 1988 and 1360 of 1990, D/- 4-12-1992.

Advocates:
Akkad V.Trivedi, Anip Sachthey, BIMAL ROY JAD, Fazal, Faziul Qadir, M.N.SHROFF, MINAKSHI ARORA, P.H.Parekh, P.S.POTI, R.F.NARIMAN

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 and 19(1) (g) - Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Section 214 , 48 , 45 and 52 - Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 - Rule 81(2) - Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Punjab Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act,1959 - Section 5 - Non-agricultural land - Land revenue - Appellant-Company holds a large parcel of land admeasuring about 2 lakh suare metres comprising 30 different survey numbers of Asarwa Ward of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation - Prior to these lands were assessed as non-agricultural lands at rate of 2 paise per square metre which was in force at that time - Said Rules were made as applicable to State - At that rate, Company paid a total land revenue - Principal amendment related to rate of assessment of non-agricultural land whereby erstwhile rate of 2 paise was raised to 15 paise per square metre - Amendment also classified assessable lands on basis of their locations, viz., whether they were in villages, towns and cities, and on basis of population of area and the non-agricultural user to which land was being put - State Government invited objections to draft rules before Since no objections were received, State Government made draft rules final and published them – During pendency of writ petitions, State Government withdrew notification dated issuing final rules, and granted time of one month from to members of public to object to draft rules published – Held, returns or income from different uses of land is bound to be varied and, therefore, under said section it is permissible to levy different rates depending upon income or return from use to which land is put - This proposition is not disputed - However, his attack is directed against the further classification of user based on location of the land - According to him, since the assessment is based on use of land, return or income from such use would not vary from location to location and hence different rates of assessment fixed on basis of location of industrial use is ultra vires S.48 of Act - Rental will certainly differ from use to which land is put as well as with location of land - Land is city or town like Ahmedabad and available for industrial use is bound to fetch more rental than land put to same use in a village - In fact, if irrespective of their locations, lands are assessed at same rate for purposes of land revenue, such assessment will fall foul of Art. 14 of Constitution - Assessment so made has no relation to actual rental derived by land owner - Rentals derived have relation only to the gradations of land made and assessment levied on basis of such gradations into low income and high income yielding lands – Court are, therefore unable to appreciate this argument either - Hence, appeals fail and are dismissed with costs.

Judgment

SAWANT,J. :- The facts leading to the common questions of law which arise in these appeals may be taken from one of the appeals. viz., Civil Appeal No. 82 of 1985. The appellant-Company holds a large parcel of land admeasuring about 2 lakh suare metres comprising 30 different survey numbers of Asarwa Ward of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. Prior to 1st August, 1976. these lands were assessed as non-agricultural lands. at the rate of 2 paise per square metre under Rule8(2) ((sic) Rule 81(2) of the Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 [the 1972 Rules] which was in force at that time. The said Rules were made under Section 214 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 [the Code,] as applicable to the State of Gujarat. At that rate, the Company paid a total land revenue of Rs. 5,823.23 per annum. It also appears that the Company paid in addition to the land revenue local fund cess and education cess each of which was calculated at the rate of 50 per cent of the amount of the land revenue.

2. On 21st July, 1976, the State Govern(Para 22) ment published draft rules amending 1972 Rules. The principal amendment related to the rate of the assessment of the non-agricultural land whereby the erstwhile rate of 2 paise was raised to 15 paise per square metre. The amendment also classified the assessable lands on the basis of their locations, viz., whether they were in villages, towns and cities, and on the basis of the population of the area and the non-agricultural user to which the land was being put. The State Government invited objections to the draft rules before 30th July, 1976. Since no objections were received, the State Government made the draft rules final and published them on 31st July, 1976 bringing them into force w.e.f. 1st August, 1976. Several writ petitions challenging the said rules were filed in the High Court. One of the contentions in the petitions was that sufficient time was not given to raise objections to the draft rules. During the pendency of the writ petitions, the State Government on 28th June, 1977 withdrew the notification dated 31st July, 1976 issuing the final rules, and granted time of one month from 28th June. 1977 to the members of the public to object to the draft rules published on 21st July, 1977. After considering the objections received, the State Government issued a fresh notification on 24th January, 1978 issuing final rules which were brought into force with retrospective effect from 1st September, 1976 [the 1977 Rules,]. Under the 1977 Rules, the rate of assessment was increased from 2 paise to 10 paise per square metre [thus reducing the rate of assessment to 10 paise from 15 paise per square metre which was fixed under July 1976 Rules].

3. On 10th December, 1980, by an ordinance the State Government also amended S.214 of the Code to enable the Government to give the rules made thereunder a retrospective effect. The Ordinance became an Act on 24th February, 1981.

4. The writ petitions leading to the present appeals were filed before the High Court challenging the validity of 1977 Rules on various grounds. However, ultimately, only the following issues were pressed before the High Court:

"(3). Whether the impugned Amendment Rules of 1977 are bad in law and void since they seek to levy revenue on the land used for non-agricultural purposes retrospectively, that is, with effect from 1st September, 1976 without the power or authority to enact the rules retrospectively under S.214 of the Code at all the relevant times.

(4). Whether attempt to validate the levy, assessment and collection of the non-agricultural assessment by the Gujarat Ordinance No. 20 of 1980 or for that matter by the Gujarat Act No.2 of 1981 was to all intents and purposes abortive.

(5). Whether the impugned Amendment Rules of 1977 are ultra vires S. 48 and; or Section 45 and/or Section 52 of the Code.

(6). Whether the impugned Amendment Rules of 1977 are violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India inasmuch as they are a
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top