SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 848

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY AND G. N. RAY, JJ.
Navganbhai Somabhai and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Gujarat, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 667 of 1982, D/- 22-9-1993.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 147, 148, 302 read with 149, 324 and 323 - Offence of murder – Rioting ,armed with dangerous weapons – Voluntarily causing hurt - Charged - Accused are all inter-related - They as well as deceased and material witnesses belong to same village - One day prior to date of incident - (A-1) scolded (P.W. 1) who had gone for watering his cattle and gave slap to him as he did not remove his cattle - Next day at about 10-00 a.m. again P.W. I had gone for watering his cattle and at same time, A-1 had also gone for watering his cattle and was returning home after his cattle had drunk water - At that juncture, A-1, A-2 and some others surrounded (P.W. 1) and A-I gave a dharia blow on his head and when P.W. 1 shouted, his brother and deceased came there. P. W. 4 also came there and some others gathered there - Deceased snatched away dharia from hand of A-l and threw it away but that hurt A-I and his brother - Some of them climbed roof of house and made a big hole in roof and gave blows with dharia, spear and sticks on deceased as well as on P.Ws. 1 and 4 - One of persons cried that deceased had expired - Some of accused who were outside broke open door and went inside and gave blows with sticks and spear to deceased and P.Ws. 1 and 4 - During occurrence, accused were also throwing stones on deceased and P.Ws. I and 4. After committing offence, accused left scene of occurrence – Held, In such an occurrence even if eye-witnesses have improved and have not given consistent version regarding the part played by each of accused that by itself will not be a ground to acquit accused - Presence of P.Ws. 1 and 4 has not been in dispute and having regard to number of injuries on them, it would have been impossible for witnesses to give a detailed account and in any way if while giving some account they have improved or there are some omissions, that would not be a ground to acquit accused persons whose names have been consistently mentioned throughout in a case of this nature and S. 149, IPC is applicable here - Trial Court, however, proceeded further to state that if version given is contradicted by medical evidence then evidence has to be naturally discarded - Court do not find such direct conflict between medical evidence and witnesses - Even otherwise, we agree with High Court that evidence of P.Ws. 1 and 4, injured witnesses, is generally acceptable regarding presence and participation of the appellants in sense that they continued to be members of unlawful assembly - Therefore, Court are unable to agree with learned counsel that the view taken by High Court in any way is erroneous - There are no grounds to interfere - In result, appeal is dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Thirteen accused convicted by the High Court preferred a special leave petition. This Court granted leave only in respect of Original Accused Nos. 4, 9, 12 and 13 i.e. Petitioners Nos. 10, 11, 12 and 13 and dismissed the same in respect of others. Those four petitioners (Nos 10,11,12 and 13) are the appellants in this appeal before us. An incident took place on 3-6-1979 at about 11.30 a.m. at village Matoda, Ahmedabad District, during the course of which one Cheha Mana, the deceased in the case, was killed and two other persons who figured as P.Ws. 1 and 4 received a number of injuries on vital parts. In relation to this incident, 14 accused were challaned and tried for offences punishable u/ Ss. 147, 148, 302 read with Ss. 149,324 and Section 323 read with Section 149, I.P.C. The Trial Court acquitted A-4, A-9, A-12, A-13 and A-14 and convicted the remaining accused u/S.326 read with S.149, I.P,C. and also under Ss. 324 and 326 I.P.C. U/S. 326, I.P.C. the convicted accused were sentenced to two years R.I. and in respect of other offences they were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. The convicted accused preferred an appeal and the State also preferred an appeal against the acquittal of all the fourteen accused in respect of the murder charge. The High Court confirmed the acquittal of A-14 and set aside the acquittal of A-4, A-9, A-12 and A-13 and allowed the State appeal and convicted all the remaining 13 accused under Section 304. Part I, I. P.C. read with Section 149, I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo four years RI. All of them, as mentioned above, preferred the special leave petition but we are left with only these four appellants, as stated above.

2. The prosecution case is as follows:

The accused are all inter-related They as well as the deceased and the material witnesses belong to the same village. One day prior to the date of the incident. Ajmal (A-1) scolded Raman (P.W. 1) who had gone for watering his cattle and gave slap to him as he did not remove his cattle. Next day at about 10-00 a.m. again P.W. I had gone for watering his cattle and at the same time, A-1 had also gone for watering his cattle and was returning home after his cattle had drunk water. At that juncture, A-1, A-2 and some others surrounded Raman (P.W. 1) and A-I gave a dharia blow on his head and when P.W. 1 shouted, his brother and the deceased came there. P. W. 4 also came there and some others gathered there. The deceased snatched away the dharia from the hand of A-l and threw it away but that hurt A-I and his brother. Thereafter, the accused went to their respective houses and 10-15 minutes later when P.W. 1, the deceased and P.W. 4 were sitting outside their house, all the fourteen accused armed with spear, dharia and sticks came uttering words and on seeing them, the deceased, P. Ws. I and 4 concealed themselves in the house of their uncle Chhela Vala. The uncle tried to persuade the accused persons but they did not agree. Some of them climbed the roof of the house of Chhela Vala and made a big hole in the roof and gave the blows with dharia, spear and sticks on the deceased as well as on P.Ws. 1 and 4. One of the persons cried that the deceased had expired. Some of the accused who were outside broke open the door and went inside and gave the blows with sticks and spear to the deceased and P.Ws. 1 and 4. During the occurrence, the accused were also throwing stones on the deceased and P.Ws. I and 4. After committing the offence, the accused left the scene of occurrence. A report was given to the police and they arrived and sent the injured persons in a jeep and they were transferred to the civil hospital at Ahmedabad later. The dead body was lying there which was sent for post-mortem and the doctor (P.W. 3) who conducted the post-mortem found as many as 32 injuries on the deceased and on internal examination he found a fracture of the right side frontal and temporal bones and comminuted fractures at the base of the sku






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top