SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 491

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P. B. SAWANT AND S. C. AGRAWAL, JJ.
S. S. Grewal, Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 241 of 1993, D/- 7-5-1993.

Advocates:
ASHOK MAHAJAN, G.K.BANSAL, HARISH N.SLAVE, JAGDISH SINGH, Naresh Bakshi, R.S.Yadav, UJAGAR SINGH

Headnote:

Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963 - Rule 8-A - Direct recruitment - Selection - Reservation for members of Scheduled Castes/ Backward Classes - Recruitment to Service is governed by Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as The Rules) - By Rule 8-A, which was inserted in rules by notification dated instructions issued by State Goveminent from time to time in relation to reservation of appointments or posts for Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes were made applicable for purpose of making appointments to posts in Service - It was communicated that it had been decided to increase precentage of reservation in direct recruitment in all services from 20% to 25% in case of members of Scheduled Castes and from 2% to 5% in case of members belonging to Backward Classes - In said letter, it was also indicated that vacancies to be reserved for members of Scheduled Castes in a lot of 100 vacancies would be at points specified - It was further directed that if all vacancies in any block determined on basis of prescribed Roster are filled up by other category-person due to non-availability of Scheduled Castes or Backward Classes persons, reservation should be carried forward to subsequent blocks – Held, Court was dealing with appointments to Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) - Selection was made for appointment against 12 vacancies in said Service and other vacancies in Allied Services - Two of vacancies in Punjab Civil service were reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates - Three persons were selected from among members of Scheduled Caste - Appellant in said appeal was at third place in merit list of Scheduled Caste candidates - First two candidates on the merit list were appointed and appellant was appointed on post of "A" Class Tehsildar in one of Allied Services - Appellant laid his claim for such appointment on basis of instructions contained in Circular - Do not have a bearing on question in controversy in instant case because here there is no dispute that respondent No. 3 has been appointed against the post reserved for members of Scheduled Castes and question is about inter se placement of two persons appointed against vacancies reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates - Civil Writ Petition filed by appellant in High Court is allowed and it is declared that respondent No. 3 can only be treated to have been appointed against the vacancy at Point No. 9 in Roster and on that basis he must be placed below appellant in the seniority list - Respondent No. 2 is directed to revise seniority list of members of Service accordingly - Appeal allowed.

Judgment

S. C. AGRAWAL, J.:- This appeal relates to the inter se seniority of the appellant and respondent No. 3 in the Punjab Superior Judicial Service (hereinafter referred to as The Service). The appellant and respondent No. 3 were both appointed to the Service on May 26, 1986 on the basis of selection by direct recruitment. The appellant belongs to the general category whereas respondent No. 3 is a Mazhabi Sikh, which is a Scheduled Caste in Punjab.

2. The recruitment to the Service is governed by Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as The Rules). By Rule 8-A, which was inserted in the rules by notification dated June 14, 1977, the instructions issued by the State Goveminent from time to time in relation to reservation of appointments or posts for Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes were made applicable for the purpose of making appointments to the posts in the Service. The orders of the State Government relating to persons belonging to Scheduled Castes in this regard which have a bearing in this appeal are as follows :-

(1) Letter dated June 6, 1974 from the Secretary to the Government of Punjab, Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes Department to all Heads of Department etc. It was communicated that it had been decided to increase the precentage of reservation in direct recruitment in all services from 20% to 25% in the case of members of Scheduled Castes and from 2% to 5% in the case of members belonging to Backward Classes. In the said letter, it was also indicated that the vacancies to be reserved for the members of Scheduled Castes in a lot of 100 vacancies would be at the points specified below

1,5,9,13,17,21,25.29,33,37,41,45,49,3, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85, 89,93 and 97 and so on.

It was also directed that the Roster already existing would not be abandoned, but would now be maintained in continuation from the vacancy in the existing Roster last filled up according to the new pattern of reservation that has been prescribed in the earlier paragraphs in the said letter.

(2) Circular dated November 19, 1974 relates to carrying forward of reservation for members of Scheduled Castes/ Backward Classes. It was directed that "the reservation should be carried forward from vacancy to vacancy in the same block until a Scheduled Caste or a Backward Class person, as the case may be, is appointed or promoted in the same block. It was further directed that if all the vacancies in any block determined on the basis of prescribed Roster are filled up by other category-person due to non-availability of Scheduled Castes or Backward Classes persons, the reservation should be carried forward to the subsequent blocks. The said letter required that the reservation should be carried forward from vacancy to vacancy in each block and from block to block until the carried forward vacancies are filled up by the members of the Scheduled Castes or Backward Classes. It was also provided that only one reserved vacancy out of the carried forward vacancies should be filled in a block of appropriate Roster in addition to the normal reserved point of the block.

(3) Letter dated May 5, 1975, from the Secretary to the Government, Punjab, Welfare of Scheduled Castes & Backward Classes Department addressed to all Heads of Departments etc. It was communicated that the Government have decided that henceforth, 50% vacancies of the quota reserved for Scheduled Castes should be offered to Balmikis and Mazhbi Sikhs, if available, as a rirst preference from amongst the Scheduled Castes candidates.

(4) Letter dated April 8, 1980 addressed by the Under Secretary to the Government of Punjab, Welfare Department Reservation Cell, to all Heads of Departments etc. The position with regard to the implementation of instructions regarding reservation for Mazhbi Sikhs and Balmikis under the letter dated May 5, 1975 was clarified as follows :-

"i) Combined merit list can be disturbed while giving appointment to the candidate belo


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top