SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 137

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, KULDIP SINGH
Indian Council Of Agricultural Research And. – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Gupta – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Special leave granted.

2. Shashi Gupta was offered an appointment in the Agricultural Research Service (the Service) as Scientist Grade S in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). She was required to produce medical certificate of fitness from the medical board. Unfortunately she was declared unfit by the medical board and also by the appellate medical board. She challenged the medical reports by way of a civil writ petition before the Delhi High Court. The writ petition was transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (the Tribunal). The Principal Bench of the tribunal by its judgment dated February 13, 1992 quashed the medical reports and directed the ICAR to appoint Shashi Gupta to the Service as Scientist Grade S. This appeal by ICAR is against the judgment of the tribunal.

3. Shashi Guptajoined Service as Senior Computer Assistant in the Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IASRI) with effect from February 10, 1975. The said post was redesignated as Technical Assistant with effect from October 1, 1975. The ICAR constituted the Service with effect from October 1, 1975 under the Rules called The Agricultural Research Service Rul

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top