SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 616

K.RAMASWAMY, N.P.SINGH
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Sukhdev – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants stated that some of the respondents in the following appeals had died and the-appeals shall stand abated against the following respondents. Therefore, the appeals shall stand dismissed as abated against the following respondents:

1. C.A. No.2437/88. respondent No. 1

2. C.A. Nos. 2403, 2432-33/88 All respondents

3. C.A. No. 2408/88 sole respondent

4. C.A. No. 2400/88 respondent Nos. 1 & 2

5. C.A. No. 2398/88 respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4& 6

6. C.A. No. 2401/88 respondent Nos. 1 & 3

7. C.A. No.2402/88 respondent Nos. 1 & 2

8. C.A. No. 2404/ 88 respondent Nos. 1 & 3

9. C.A. No.2407/88 respondent Nos. 1, 7, 12, 13, 16, 22, 24, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39 & (sic)

10. C.A. No.2411/88 sole respondent

11.C.A. No. 2412/ 88 sole respondent

12. C.A. No. 2413/88 respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5.

13.C.A. No. 2414/ 88 respondent No. 1

14.C.A. No. 2415/88 sole respondent

15.C.A. No. 2416/88 sole respondent

16.C.A. No. 2418/88 respondent Nos. 3 & 4

17.C.A. No. 2423/88 respondent Nos. 1, 3

18.C.A. No. 2425/88 respondent Nos. 4, 7

19. C.A. No. 2426/88 sole respondent

20. C.A. No. 2427/ 88 sole respondent

21. C.A. No. 2428/88 respondent Nos. 1, 2 &6

22. C.A. No. 2431/88 sole respondent










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top