SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1069

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, R.M.SAHAI, S.P.BHARUCHA
Damu Ganu Bendale – Appellant
Versus
Arvinda Dhondu Talekar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This tenants appeal by grant of special leave is directed against judgment and order of the Bombay High Court dismissing the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution in limine.

2. The only dispute that arises for consideration is if the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) was justified in interfering with the findings of fact recorded by the appellate authority in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The dispute is about Survey No. 91. The appellant claimed by filing a Tenancy Case No. 31/1973 under S. 70(b) of the Act seeking declaration that he had become tenant of the land in dispute. Later on he filed a civil suit for injunction against the landlord. Since on the pleadings issue of tenancy arose the Court made reference under Section 85 of the Act to the Tehsildar for recording a finding whether the appellant was a tenant. Both, the claim filed under the Act and the reference made by the Civil Court were taken up by the appropriate authority, namely, the Tehsildar and it was held in favour of the landlord. In appeal, t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top