A.M.AHMADI, M.M.PUNCHHI, N.P.SINGH
M. Venugopal – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Machilipatnam, A. P. – Respondent
Judgment
N. P. SINGH, J. :- This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the High Court, dismissing the writ application filed on behalf of the appellant for quashing the order of termination of his services, during the period of probation.
2. The appellant was appointed as Development Officer by the respondent. Life Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation"), on probation for a period of one year from 23-5-1984 to 22-5-1985. The period of probation of the appellant was extended for a further period of one year from 23-5-1985 to 22-5-1986. Clauses 3 to 6 of the order of appointment deal with the code of conduct to be followed : clauses 6 to 9 deal with tours, advance deposits, record of work and collection of premiums; clause 10 deals with the minimum business that the appellant was expected to do during the period specified, clause 11 deals with confirmation and is as follows :-
"11. Confirmation and Increments
(i) On your satisfactorily completing the period of probation and your observance and compliance with all conditions set out in this letter of appointment, you will be confirmed in the services of the Corporation in Class-II. Your confirmation wi
referred to : State Bank of India v. N. Sundara Money
Santosh Gupta v. State Bank of Patiala
Aswini Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Base
A.V. Fernandez v. State of Kerala
South India Corporation (P) Ltd. v. secretary, Board of Revenue, Trivandrum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.