SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 862

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY AND G.N. RAY, JJ.
State of W.B., Appellant
Versus
Orilal Jaiswal and another, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 734 of 1991, D/-25-9-1993.

Advocates:
ASIM MALHOTRA, B.B.TAVAKLEY, D.K.SINHA, D.N.MUKHERJI, P.S.POTI, R.K.JAIN, S.C.GHOSH

Headnote:Code of Cr. Procedure, 1973, sec. 154-Lodging of the information by the mother of the deceased newly wed bride on the next day of the incident-delay-explanation provided for the delay-considering the circumstance and mental frame work it can not be held that there has been unjustified inordinate delay in lodging the F.I.R. (Para 11)

       Evidence Act, 1872, sec. 3 & 113A-in a criminal trial the degree of proof is stricter than what is required in a civil proceeding-the charges against the accused must be proved beyond all reasonable doubts and does not stand altered even after the introduction of sec 498 A I.P.C. and u/s 113A of the Act-although Court's conscience must be satisfied that the accused is not held guilty when there are reasonable doubts about complicity of the accused in respect of offences alleged-(1950)2 All ER 458 and AIR 1990 SC 209 ref. (Paras 14 & 15)

       Penal Code, 1860, sec. 306, 498A & 301-deceased newly wed. mal treated and tortured both physically and mentally by husband and mother in law and several complaints made when she had come to her father's house-quarrel between the deceased and her mother- in-law reported by husband on the day when she committed suicide by hanging- prosecution by evidence making out a case of maltreatment and torture on account of bridal presents-trial court convicting the accused but the High Court set aside the order of conviction and acquitting the accused giving benefits of doubts and also highlighting delay in lodging FIR and absence of some evidence and holding that there is no evidence of maltreatment-it will not be correct to held so - High Court not Correct In drawing adverse Inference for non examination of neighbours and tenants-the acts of cruelty by the accused were expected to be known by very close relations like mother under explanation (a) of sec 498A ‘cruelty' defined-charge u/s 498A furry established-AIR 1979 SC 135 ref. (Paras 12, 13, 16 & 17)

Judgment

G.N. RAY, J.:- This appeal has been preferred by the State of West Bengal against the judgment of acquittal dated May 14, 1990 passed by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 195 of 1990. By the aforesaid judgment, the conviction and sentences against the accused, Sri Orilal Jaiswal and his mother, Smt. Gujarati Debi Jaiswal, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, 12th Bench of the City Sessions Court, Calcutta on February 29, 1990 in Sessions Trial No. 1 of 1990 was set aside by the High Court and the accused were acquitted of the conviction under S. 306 read with S. 34, IPC. and sentence of 5 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1000/- in default simple imprisonment for 3 months and conviction under S. 498A read with S.34, IPC and, sentence of one year rigorous imprisonment, and a fine of Rs. 1000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months.

The prosecution case in short is that Usha Jaiswal had committed suicide by hanging on April 19, 1986 in the house of her husband and the in-laws within a year from the date of marriage which was solemnised between Usha Jaiswal and the accused No. 1, Orilal Jaiswal on May 31, 1985. It is the case of the prosecution that it was a negotiated marriage and according to the demand of the accused persons and other members of the family of in-laws sufficient dowry including colour T.V., motor cycle, gold ornaments etc. had been given at the time of marriage. The prosecution case is that the deceased, Usha Jaiswal, who was only 20 years old had been treated cruelly and had been tortured both mentally and physically by the accused. It has been alleged that within a few days after the marriage, the father-in-law of the accused No. 2 had died and the accused No. 2 had treated the deceased cruelly by telling her that she was a woman of evil luck (alakshmi) and because of her evil luck, the father-in-law had died shortly after the marriage. It has also been alleged that after the marriage, the deceased, Usha Jaiswal, had conceived but there had been art abortion after being admitted in the hospital. The accused No. 2, the mother-in-law of the Usha Jaiswal caused severe mental pain by telling her in the hospital itself that she was a woman of evil luck and that she had swallowed her baby and she should commit suicide. It has also been alleged that the accused No. 1 the husband of the deceased often used to come home drunk and physically assault the deceased. Both the husband and his mother had also caused severe mental torture to the deceased by telling that she had brought bridal presents of sub-standard quality and such articles should be taken back and dowry gifts of good quality should be brought. It has been alleged by the prosecution that as a result of such physical and mental torture by the accused persons, the deceased became unhappy and on several occasions when she had come to her fathers house, she complained that she had been maltreated and tortured both physically and mentally with cruelty by the husband and mother-in-law in the manner aforesaid. It has also been alleged that even on the day when the deceased had committed suicide, namely on April 19, 1986, the accused No.1, Orilal Jaiswal, came to the parental house of the deceased at about 10-00 a.m. and informed the mother of the deceased that his wife and mother had been quarrelling and she should go to his house for settlement but the mother of the deceased then informed the accused No. 1 that she would send her son the next day to the house of the accused persons but shortly thereafter, a brother of the deceased came to the house and informed the other brother and the mother that something had happened to his elder sister, namely, the deceased and she had been taken to the hospital. The elder brother and thereafter parents and other relations of the deceased rushed to the hospital when they were informed that the deceased Usha Jaiswal had committed suicide.

2. The brother o




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top